Germany - Italy
Will the hosts reach the final or the Italians? Both teams have played well at the world cup, the Germans come off a much tougher game.
The portents:
In Italy's favour they seem to make the final every 12 years, they are due the appearance, they made the final (and won) the last time Italian football were embroiled in a scandal - 1982, and Italy have the upper hand over Germany in world cups. Italy with their renowned defence and dangerous attack will be a handful.
In Germany's favour the host nation often goes to the final, Italy have been stopped in their tracks by the host nation in the last two world cups, Germany won the tournament when it was last held on German soil. They are missing Torsten Frings but overall their team has played an exciting brand of football and may go into the match as favourites! And expect them to win if it reaches penalties.
Down to the last four, only one of the nations can win - pity I don't really like any of them. France are the best of a bad job I think.
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Christiano Ronaldo
Now lots of English fans don't like him: the perception - he tried to get Rooney sent off, he riled him up with a head rub at the start of the game, and he winks happily at the Portugese bench when Rooney is sent off.
This video shows these actions to demonsrate exactly why he has suddenly become a hate figure.
Other websites have been spawned. Take a look at this to see the bitter vitriol.
Of course once in a while they did get on - rather too well!
This video shows these actions to demonsrate exactly why he has suddenly become a hate figure.
Other websites have been spawned. Take a look at this to see the bitter vitriol.
Of course once in a while they did get on - rather too well!
.jpg)
England - the aftermath.
Personally I was pretty gutted at the England loss, although their exit did not surprise me. I did feel they didn't really deserve to go out, but nor did I feel they really deserved to go through. Overall they came out of the Portugal match with more credit, except for the hopeless display of lack of nerves in the penalties.
After that game I sat quietly, flat, after going out like that. During the penalties I did shout quite a bit, and I had a couple of tears glistening in the corner of my eye. It was England's first game in the tournament I'd felt really passionate about.
I have since been listening to this CD of England songs Mum burnt me, that my family had sent as a gift over from the UK. "Football's coming home" is naturally the most emotional song as I remember it well from England's Euro 96 campaign.
But the feeling was no way near as intense as my distress about Leeds has been (on a number of occasions).
So let us summarise some aspects of England's campaign
Sven:
Picked a squad with only 4 strikers, 2 of whom were under a big fitness cloud. Didn't bring along a Defoe, Bent or Ashton instead of a midfielder like Jenas who is a) not up to it and b) as likely to start a game as the Pope is to renounce catholicism. And include a 17 yr old gamble in Theo Walcott, and then refuse to play him (although admittedly I imagine the experience of just going was good for him).
At Germany itself, started off with a reasonable line-up. 4-4-2 was the way to go. This was with Owen and Crouch up front. When Owen came off injured against Sweden after he and Rooney started, Crouch was the replacement. And as a pair they looked good, Rooney doing his usual great job of linking midfield and attack, and looking dangerouse in his first competitive action since breaking a metatarsal. They played a good game plan of playing to feet and looked good (first half at least). So why did Sven fiddle with his formation, make a 4-5-1 (4-1-4-1)? He left Rooney isolated up front, not the role he relishes, and possibly part of the reason he became frustrated against Portugal and behaved rashly (not to excuse the little blighter one jot!)
He persisted with Beckham, with no appetite to change him at all, regardless of performance. In fact against Ecuador he was so obviously physically sick - it took Sven an extra 17 minutes (approx) to see what the rest of the world already knew. yes Beckham did a couple of useful things in the dead ball situation, setting up a couple of goals, and scoring one himself. So perhaps he deserved a start? Perhaps, but there was no need to keep him on so long. Lennon was gagging for a start. I was gagging for Lennon. Most of England was gagging for the protege born and bred in Leeds and taught his footballing trade there - Aaron Lennon. When he made the forced sub against Portugal Lennon looked exciting, fresh and good in the last 15 mins of normal time plus extra time.
And Lampard had a bit of a shocker at the world cup. Nigh on 30 shots and nothing to show for it. Never seeming to be able to replicate his Chelsea form, perhaps frozen on the biggest stage. Did Sven even contemplate dropping one of his big names, thus allowing a 4-4-2 that included a defensive midfielder in Hargreaves? Did he hell as like. Boy would I have liked to see the following team and formation at some stage:
Robbo
Neville Rio Terry Cole
Lennon Gerrard Hargreaves Cole
Rooney Crouch
(with the midfield as a bit of a diamond, Hargreaves breaking up the attacks and distributing, Gerrard supporting the strikers - even if this only happened for half an hour at the opportune time!)
Instead Gerrard was often wasted going forward too much and neglecting the midfield where he excels. Crouch was not given enough a run. Sven needed to have confidence in his abilities that saw him score 6 goals in 10 (I believe) in the run up to the world cup.
And what kind of a coach constantly changes formation. The teams who have done best tend to have had a formation and a first choice team sheet and stuck with it barring injury or suspension in which case different players would fit in the formation. Sven seemed to like his formation because it could accommodate all his star men - not the basis on which to build a football team.
On 4 Million pounds a year surely he could have done better. And how much influence did McClaren have? Do we think things will improve under him - I'm sceptical.
After the world cup Sven's press conference included 9 separate instances of him saying sorry.
THE PLAYERS
Rooney - so much emphasis by the media on one man. He recovered from his injury quicker than expected, didn't score (at times this was due to the formation), and acted rather hotheadedly. Was passionate to do well and worked his bollocks off, one indiscretion we may forgive him for...in a few years time!
Hargreaves - Awesome! My England player of the tournament. Under so much criticism for even being in the squad he proved his doubters wrong. Most of us have only ever seen Hargreaves given a token last 15 minutes, maybe in a random position like left wing. In his favoured midfield role (and also at right back) he really showed his stuff. Good stuff my man.
Others did good stuff now and again. Joe Cole looked sensational in the first half against Sweden scoring the wonder goal, Gerrard hit a blinder against T & T. Beckham was at times on the money, at others his passing was just woeful. Terry gave a mixed bag. Rio did well. Robbo did OK but he's not the man for penalties. Neville did OK. Lennon was exciting. Crouch did OK when asked.
But overall the players were a let down.
The Argentinian Ref in the Portugal game.
I think made a couple of boo boos. And also with regard to the Rooney sending off I have found out he was absolutely adamant it was for the stamp. If that was the case I think the stamp warranted no more than the yellow card. Combined with the push though it was maybe worth a red, but the ref seemed to think the push didn't require punishment.
After that game I sat quietly, flat, after going out like that. During the penalties I did shout quite a bit, and I had a couple of tears glistening in the corner of my eye. It was England's first game in the tournament I'd felt really passionate about.
I have since been listening to this CD of England songs Mum burnt me, that my family had sent as a gift over from the UK. "Football's coming home" is naturally the most emotional song as I remember it well from England's Euro 96 campaign.
But the feeling was no way near as intense as my distress about Leeds has been (on a number of occasions).
So let us summarise some aspects of England's campaign
Sven:
Picked a squad with only 4 strikers, 2 of whom were under a big fitness cloud. Didn't bring along a Defoe, Bent or Ashton instead of a midfielder like Jenas who is a) not up to it and b) as likely to start a game as the Pope is to renounce catholicism. And include a 17 yr old gamble in Theo Walcott, and then refuse to play him (although admittedly I imagine the experience of just going was good for him).
At Germany itself, started off with a reasonable line-up. 4-4-2 was the way to go. This was with Owen and Crouch up front. When Owen came off injured against Sweden after he and Rooney started, Crouch was the replacement. And as a pair they looked good, Rooney doing his usual great job of linking midfield and attack, and looking dangerouse in his first competitive action since breaking a metatarsal. They played a good game plan of playing to feet and looked good (first half at least). So why did Sven fiddle with his formation, make a 4-5-1 (4-1-4-1)? He left Rooney isolated up front, not the role he relishes, and possibly part of the reason he became frustrated against Portugal and behaved rashly (not to excuse the little blighter one jot!)
He persisted with Beckham, with no appetite to change him at all, regardless of performance. In fact against Ecuador he was so obviously physically sick - it took Sven an extra 17 minutes (approx) to see what the rest of the world already knew. yes Beckham did a couple of useful things in the dead ball situation, setting up a couple of goals, and scoring one himself. So perhaps he deserved a start? Perhaps, but there was no need to keep him on so long. Lennon was gagging for a start. I was gagging for Lennon. Most of England was gagging for the protege born and bred in Leeds and taught his footballing trade there - Aaron Lennon. When he made the forced sub against Portugal Lennon looked exciting, fresh and good in the last 15 mins of normal time plus extra time.
And Lampard had a bit of a shocker at the world cup. Nigh on 30 shots and nothing to show for it. Never seeming to be able to replicate his Chelsea form, perhaps frozen on the biggest stage. Did Sven even contemplate dropping one of his big names, thus allowing a 4-4-2 that included a defensive midfielder in Hargreaves? Did he hell as like. Boy would I have liked to see the following team and formation at some stage:
Robbo
Neville Rio Terry Cole
Lennon Gerrard Hargreaves Cole
Rooney Crouch
(with the midfield as a bit of a diamond, Hargreaves breaking up the attacks and distributing, Gerrard supporting the strikers - even if this only happened for half an hour at the opportune time!)
Instead Gerrard was often wasted going forward too much and neglecting the midfield where he excels. Crouch was not given enough a run. Sven needed to have confidence in his abilities that saw him score 6 goals in 10 (I believe) in the run up to the world cup.
And what kind of a coach constantly changes formation. The teams who have done best tend to have had a formation and a first choice team sheet and stuck with it barring injury or suspension in which case different players would fit in the formation. Sven seemed to like his formation because it could accommodate all his star men - not the basis on which to build a football team.
On 4 Million pounds a year surely he could have done better. And how much influence did McClaren have? Do we think things will improve under him - I'm sceptical.
After the world cup Sven's press conference included 9 separate instances of him saying sorry.
THE PLAYERS
Rooney - so much emphasis by the media on one man. He recovered from his injury quicker than expected, didn't score (at times this was due to the formation), and acted rather hotheadedly. Was passionate to do well and worked his bollocks off, one indiscretion we may forgive him for...in a few years time!
Hargreaves - Awesome! My England player of the tournament. Under so much criticism for even being in the squad he proved his doubters wrong. Most of us have only ever seen Hargreaves given a token last 15 minutes, maybe in a random position like left wing. In his favoured midfield role (and also at right back) he really showed his stuff. Good stuff my man.
Others did good stuff now and again. Joe Cole looked sensational in the first half against Sweden scoring the wonder goal, Gerrard hit a blinder against T & T. Beckham was at times on the money, at others his passing was just woeful. Terry gave a mixed bag. Rio did well. Robbo did OK but he's not the man for penalties. Neville did OK. Lennon was exciting. Crouch did OK when asked.
But overall the players were a let down.
The Argentinian Ref in the Portugal game.
I think made a couple of boo boos. And also with regard to the Rooney sending off I have found out he was absolutely adamant it was for the stamp. If that was the case I think the stamp warranted no more than the yellow card. Combined with the push though it was maybe worth a red, but the ref seemed to think the push didn't require punishment.
France stun Brazil.
France 1-0 Brazil.
Who actually expected this result? Admittedly France have suddenly come into some form in the last game against Spain, and Brazil never looked like the awesome team they could be, however the consensus was that they have the flair and the personnel to take them past France. The consensus was wrong.
The game itself was actually a little disappointing. Up until France scored in the early part of the second half there was little action of note. France were the better team in the first period but didn't have the clear opportunities to show for it. In fact both sides created few efforts. Malouda had a header that went over from a Zidane free kick, there were a few free kicks and moments from both sides, but whilst it was a fascinating encounter goalscoring opportunities were indeed a rare commodity. France also had an appeal for a penalty for handball turned down, it instead resulting in a free kick - replays show a penalty may have been more appropriate.
France's goal: A free kick floated in from deep on the left, from Zidane, eluded everyone only to find an unmarked Henry ghosting in at the back post and volleying forcefully home, leaving Dida with no chance. After this point Brazil attacked a lot more. With the talent they have it is such a shame that their attacking verve was not present from the offset. But even then the chances were either not great, or were not attempted with the precision one would expect. Ze Roberto whipped in a dangerous cross-cum-shot that Barthez had to be alert to, Robinho had a great chance but sliced miles wide. In the dying minutes and seconds Brazil became more desperate and Ronaldinho fired a free kick narrowly over after a tricky Ronaldo run was brought to a premature halt. Ronaldo also had a long range effort forcing the Barthez save. Space opened up at the other end for france to finish off, Zidane setting up Saha who's finish was disappointing.
France thoroughly deserved their win. They were excellent. After a faltering group stages in which they found goalscoring difficult, they lacked sharpness, and almost were eliminated, France have looked sublime at times in the knockout stages. Zidane was immense throughout the match. So many amazing touches, always the one to set up the shots, the one with the vision, and the great free kicks. In the second half Henry and Ribery also troubled with their pace, Ribery almost finishing off a lovely move, only for Dida to clutch the ball on the edge of the area. Yes Zidane was spectacular. The oldies had combined well in the game. Can they do so another two times and bring Jules Rimet home, and cap off a marvellous Zidane career?
Who actually expected this result? Admittedly France have suddenly come into some form in the last game against Spain, and Brazil never looked like the awesome team they could be, however the consensus was that they have the flair and the personnel to take them past France. The consensus was wrong.
The game itself was actually a little disappointing. Up until France scored in the early part of the second half there was little action of note. France were the better team in the first period but didn't have the clear opportunities to show for it. In fact both sides created few efforts. Malouda had a header that went over from a Zidane free kick, there were a few free kicks and moments from both sides, but whilst it was a fascinating encounter goalscoring opportunities were indeed a rare commodity. France also had an appeal for a penalty for handball turned down, it instead resulting in a free kick - replays show a penalty may have been more appropriate.
France's goal: A free kick floated in from deep on the left, from Zidane, eluded everyone only to find an unmarked Henry ghosting in at the back post and volleying forcefully home, leaving Dida with no chance. After this point Brazil attacked a lot more. With the talent they have it is such a shame that their attacking verve was not present from the offset. But even then the chances were either not great, or were not attempted with the precision one would expect. Ze Roberto whipped in a dangerous cross-cum-shot that Barthez had to be alert to, Robinho had a great chance but sliced miles wide. In the dying minutes and seconds Brazil became more desperate and Ronaldinho fired a free kick narrowly over after a tricky Ronaldo run was brought to a premature halt. Ronaldo also had a long range effort forcing the Barthez save. Space opened up at the other end for france to finish off, Zidane setting up Saha who's finish was disappointing.
France thoroughly deserved their win. They were excellent. After a faltering group stages in which they found goalscoring difficult, they lacked sharpness, and almost were eliminated, France have looked sublime at times in the knockout stages. Zidane was immense throughout the match. So many amazing touches, always the one to set up the shots, the one with the vision, and the great free kicks. In the second half Henry and Ribery also troubled with their pace, Ribery almost finishing off a lovely move, only for Dida to clutch the ball on the edge of the area. Yes Zidane was spectacular. The oldies had combined well in the game. Can they do so another two times and bring Jules Rimet home, and cap off a marvellous Zidane career?
More Years of hurt.
Portugal 0-0 England, 0-0 a.e.t, 3-1 PSO
First - the lineups.
Portugal welcomed back Christiano Ronaldo from injury, and what a telling fact this would be (more on that later). This was welcome news for the Portugese fans who love to see him marauding down the wing, playing exciting football. Petit was in for suspended Deco which would give the side less of an attacking edge, and Tiago coming in for Costinha.
England decided on retaining the 4-5-1 much to my chagrin, as I still maintain Rooney is wasted in that formation. Neville had recovered to take his place and Hargreaves moved into the holding role in place of Carragher. A good looking side but I'd have dropped Lampard for Crouch. Lennon was also pushing Beckham hard for a starting spot. However Sven seemed to be unable to pull out the big decisions, adopting his usual cautious approach. (Also more on Sven later methinks)
The first twenty minutes was played at a frenetic pace. Chances aplenty at both ends of the pitch, - reminding us of the exciting game back at Euro 2004. It died down quite a bit for the rest of the first half though. John Terry's booking which would have ruled him out of the semi-final had England won, was a bizarre call as it appeared that both he was simply involved in a clash of heads with both players going for the ball.
The second half's first moment of note was Beckham striking Valente's hand in the penalty area. The referee adjudged ball to hand and it was probably a fair call as I've seen the same kind of incident waved on in earlier games. This was Beckham's last contribution to the game as: forced off with an injury, Lennon was introduced, and finally a real chance to see what he could do.
Lampard was then presented with a wonderful chance, the ball coming to him in heaps of space from a corner. If this had been Lampard playing for Chelsea the net would probably have bulged - instead: a diabolical effort straight into the ground and bouncing over. Then a bit of confusion between the english attackers that could so easily have seen a goal. Lennon burst past two players and into the box, the ball sat up for Rooney, except that he and Lennon seemed to be in each others way a little too much. Had Lennon laid off the pass to him a couple of seconds earlier Rooney had would have had more time and space to manoeuvre his shot. Given Lennon's run Rooney should have kept out of his way, in which case Lennon would have had an excellent opportunity to score. Instead Rooney had a hurried shot, which was practically a slice through thin air. The ball broke for Joe Cole, yet he blazed over.
Then the red card.
Rooney got in a tangle with Carvalho. He stayed on his feet as he tussled for the ball (when he could have gone down to win himself a free kick), and ended up inadvertently stamping on Carvalho's crown jewels. Ronaldo remonstrated with the ref, Rooney pushed him out of the way, and the ref pulled out the red card. There was a little confusion as to what the red card was for. The official explanation was the stamp, however I think that is what the referee decided later would be the most palatable explanation. To me it seemed as though (and my view on this intensifies on every viewing), the ref responded to the shove by pointing Rooney out, getting him to come to him, and brandish the red. To me, it looked as if the red card was for the push. Another possible explanation (also proffered to me by a few people) was that he was going to give yellow for the stamp, and after seeing the push decided to give a straight red. However now the ref says it was only for the stamp.
Regardless, Rooney is an idiot. He should have walked away from the situation instead of getting hot headed and pushing Ronaldo. It was Beckham's 1998 retaliatory kick against Argentina all over again. If it was just for the stamp though I would have some sympathy for him, it seemed like an honest tussle, it is only at super slow mo where any intent can be interpreted. But still I consider Rooney to be a silly boy.
Ironically after the sending off, England played better. And Crouch came on to replace Joe Cole to give England an attacking option, showing some nice touches up front. Portugal also continued to threaten with Maniche, Figo and Ronaldo. Lennon should have scored after Lampard's free kick was parried. There were less opportunities in extra time but still either side could have won it. Lennon had a penalty appeal turned down although it appeared Valente won the ball honestly, even if he did take a little of the player with him. There were nervy moments for both sides as quite a few corner kicks were given, and Robinson had one fingertip save to make.
England did very well to hold on with 10 men for 60 minutes, as well as create the better of the scoring chances. Lennon looked bright and artful when he came on, Hargreaves gave an excellent display in midfield in his tackling and distribution and was my man of the match. He also showed his attacking threat with one good run down the left wing, slotting the ball inside the penalty area only for no-one to quite be on hand to slot it home. Rooney was disappointing although he was frustrated with his opportunities, and Lampard again disappointed. Terry gave a mixed bag, Ferdinand did some excellent defending. Neville did qell coming back into the side, and Gerrard had his moments.
I think from the 120 minutes that on balance England deserved to win.
But deserved, shemerved. In football deserved is practically irrelevant. It was 0-0 and that was that. Penalties would decide the victor. Could England finally break their terrible record in shoot outs?
Simao scored, and Lampard, as I knew he would (at this point I was shouting at the screen with a couple of tears glistening in my eye, knowing that he would miss but telling the bastool to score) missed - Ricardo effecting the save. An early advantage. England's night over?
But then Simao sent Robinson the wrong way, and yet hit the post. Hargreaves had his hard, low penalty partially saved, but into the goal it went.
And so the two sides were level.
And then Petit missed, shaving the outside of the post (although some reckon Robbo got his fingertips to it and actually made the save). Regardless a chance opened up for England, could they take the lead?
It was Gerrard.
Surely he would be the one man you would want to take this crucial penalty. Possibly England's most crucial player, who adeptly scored in the FA cup final. He was ashen faced and nervous. And Ricardo saved.
Then Postiga scored. And Carragher who'd come onto replace Lennon (the substitute substituted!) with about 2 minutes of extra time to go, a designated penalty taker. A strange choice perhaps. Well, first he put it in the goal. But silly old Carragher hadn't waited for the whistle, and having practised shooting it in that corner changed his tack, shot to the left, and again a save, ricocheting off Ricardo's hands and onto the crossbar. Perhaps it was part of his routine, perhaps he was being a smart arse, but I tend to think Jamie made an unprofessional mistake.
And then it was left for Ronaldo to get the win.
And he did.
Ricardo got the record for most penalties saved in a shoot out at the world cup (the English players putting the ball at too nice a height for him, and Ricardo guessing the direction expertly).
It was Euro 2004 all over again. A lot of similarities.
And yet again a heroic loss for England. How they must be sick of them. And Portugal make the last four for the second time (the first time being in 66!)
First - the lineups.
Portugal welcomed back Christiano Ronaldo from injury, and what a telling fact this would be (more on that later). This was welcome news for the Portugese fans who love to see him marauding down the wing, playing exciting football. Petit was in for suspended Deco which would give the side less of an attacking edge, and Tiago coming in for Costinha.
England decided on retaining the 4-5-1 much to my chagrin, as I still maintain Rooney is wasted in that formation. Neville had recovered to take his place and Hargreaves moved into the holding role in place of Carragher. A good looking side but I'd have dropped Lampard for Crouch. Lennon was also pushing Beckham hard for a starting spot. However Sven seemed to be unable to pull out the big decisions, adopting his usual cautious approach. (Also more on Sven later methinks)
The first twenty minutes was played at a frenetic pace. Chances aplenty at both ends of the pitch, - reminding us of the exciting game back at Euro 2004. It died down quite a bit for the rest of the first half though. John Terry's booking which would have ruled him out of the semi-final had England won, was a bizarre call as it appeared that both he was simply involved in a clash of heads with both players going for the ball.
The second half's first moment of note was Beckham striking Valente's hand in the penalty area. The referee adjudged ball to hand and it was probably a fair call as I've seen the same kind of incident waved on in earlier games. This was Beckham's last contribution to the game as: forced off with an injury, Lennon was introduced, and finally a real chance to see what he could do.
Lampard was then presented with a wonderful chance, the ball coming to him in heaps of space from a corner. If this had been Lampard playing for Chelsea the net would probably have bulged - instead: a diabolical effort straight into the ground and bouncing over. Then a bit of confusion between the english attackers that could so easily have seen a goal. Lennon burst past two players and into the box, the ball sat up for Rooney, except that he and Lennon seemed to be in each others way a little too much. Had Lennon laid off the pass to him a couple of seconds earlier Rooney had would have had more time and space to manoeuvre his shot. Given Lennon's run Rooney should have kept out of his way, in which case Lennon would have had an excellent opportunity to score. Instead Rooney had a hurried shot, which was practically a slice through thin air. The ball broke for Joe Cole, yet he blazed over.
Then the red card.
Rooney got in a tangle with Carvalho. He stayed on his feet as he tussled for the ball (when he could have gone down to win himself a free kick), and ended up inadvertently stamping on Carvalho's crown jewels. Ronaldo remonstrated with the ref, Rooney pushed him out of the way, and the ref pulled out the red card. There was a little confusion as to what the red card was for. The official explanation was the stamp, however I think that is what the referee decided later would be the most palatable explanation. To me it seemed as though (and my view on this intensifies on every viewing), the ref responded to the shove by pointing Rooney out, getting him to come to him, and brandish the red. To me, it looked as if the red card was for the push. Another possible explanation (also proffered to me by a few people) was that he was going to give yellow for the stamp, and after seeing the push decided to give a straight red. However now the ref says it was only for the stamp.
Regardless, Rooney is an idiot. He should have walked away from the situation instead of getting hot headed and pushing Ronaldo. It was Beckham's 1998 retaliatory kick against Argentina all over again. If it was just for the stamp though I would have some sympathy for him, it seemed like an honest tussle, it is only at super slow mo where any intent can be interpreted. But still I consider Rooney to be a silly boy.
Ironically after the sending off, England played better. And Crouch came on to replace Joe Cole to give England an attacking option, showing some nice touches up front. Portugal also continued to threaten with Maniche, Figo and Ronaldo. Lennon should have scored after Lampard's free kick was parried. There were less opportunities in extra time but still either side could have won it. Lennon had a penalty appeal turned down although it appeared Valente won the ball honestly, even if he did take a little of the player with him. There were nervy moments for both sides as quite a few corner kicks were given, and Robinson had one fingertip save to make.
England did very well to hold on with 10 men for 60 minutes, as well as create the better of the scoring chances. Lennon looked bright and artful when he came on, Hargreaves gave an excellent display in midfield in his tackling and distribution and was my man of the match. He also showed his attacking threat with one good run down the left wing, slotting the ball inside the penalty area only for no-one to quite be on hand to slot it home. Rooney was disappointing although he was frustrated with his opportunities, and Lampard again disappointed. Terry gave a mixed bag, Ferdinand did some excellent defending. Neville did qell coming back into the side, and Gerrard had his moments.
I think from the 120 minutes that on balance England deserved to win.
But deserved, shemerved. In football deserved is practically irrelevant. It was 0-0 and that was that. Penalties would decide the victor. Could England finally break their terrible record in shoot outs?
Simao scored, and Lampard, as I knew he would (at this point I was shouting at the screen with a couple of tears glistening in my eye, knowing that he would miss but telling the bastool to score) missed - Ricardo effecting the save. An early advantage. England's night over?
But then Simao sent Robinson the wrong way, and yet hit the post. Hargreaves had his hard, low penalty partially saved, but into the goal it went.
And so the two sides were level.
And then Petit missed, shaving the outside of the post (although some reckon Robbo got his fingertips to it and actually made the save). Regardless a chance opened up for England, could they take the lead?
It was Gerrard.
Surely he would be the one man you would want to take this crucial penalty. Possibly England's most crucial player, who adeptly scored in the FA cup final. He was ashen faced and nervous. And Ricardo saved.
Then Postiga scored. And Carragher who'd come onto replace Lennon (the substitute substituted!) with about 2 minutes of extra time to go, a designated penalty taker. A strange choice perhaps. Well, first he put it in the goal. But silly old Carragher hadn't waited for the whistle, and having practised shooting it in that corner changed his tack, shot to the left, and again a save, ricocheting off Ricardo's hands and onto the crossbar. Perhaps it was part of his routine, perhaps he was being a smart arse, but I tend to think Jamie made an unprofessional mistake.
And then it was left for Ronaldo to get the win.
And he did.
Ricardo got the record for most penalties saved in a shoot out at the world cup (the English players putting the ball at too nice a height for him, and Ricardo guessing the direction expertly).
It was Euro 2004 all over again. A lot of similarities.
And yet again a heroic loss for England. How they must be sick of them. And Portugal make the last four for the second time (the first time being in 66!)
Final Quarter-final previews.
This is a little bit weird writing this post. The last two quarterfinals are the first time I have not got round to writing a preview for any of the knock-out games. For completeness I would like to do so, even though these games have been well and truly gone (obviously this requires me to remember how my mind was working before these matches, and imagine they do not exist yet - believe you me I am happy to return to this stage in my life than be where I am now! lol). Bear with me, or ignore the post, do as you please!
England - Portugal
A repeat of Euro 2004. Could it be the third time in three consecutive tournaments that the volcano (Scolari) defeats the iceman (Sven) at the quarter-final stage? Or will that voodoo be broken? Can Portugal cope without their (arguably) most influential player in Deco? Can England end 40 years of hurt? Or will it be Sven's last game in charge? One has to hope for England's sake it doesn't get to penalties - otherwise no doubt they will do their usual choking trick.
No doubt England will raise their game against Portugal. Thus far they have been playing poorly and getting results but England always tend to play better against higher quality opposition. This should mean for an entertaining match. Whether it will be enough to secure England a last four berth will remain to be seen.
France - Brazil
Will France continue to be Brazil's bogey team or will Brazil finally gel as a team for a whole 90 minutes rather than rely on moments of individual brilliance? Will Ronaldinho silence his critics? Will Zidane bow out with a whimper? Can Brazil defend their crown? What sort of confidence will France's victory over Spain give them?
England - Portugal
A repeat of Euro 2004. Could it be the third time in three consecutive tournaments that the volcano (Scolari) defeats the iceman (Sven) at the quarter-final stage? Or will that voodoo be broken? Can Portugal cope without their (arguably) most influential player in Deco? Can England end 40 years of hurt? Or will it be Sven's last game in charge? One has to hope for England's sake it doesn't get to penalties - otherwise no doubt they will do their usual choking trick.
No doubt England will raise their game against Portugal. Thus far they have been playing poorly and getting results but England always tend to play better against higher quality opposition. This should mean for an entertaining match. Whether it will be enough to secure England a last four berth will remain to be seen.
France - Brazil
Will France continue to be Brazil's bogey team or will Brazil finally gel as a team for a whole 90 minutes rather than rely on moments of individual brilliance? Will Ronaldinho silence his critics? Will Zidane bow out with a whimper? Can Brazil defend their crown? What sort of confidence will France's victory over Spain give them?
Italians ease into last four.
Italy 3-0 Ukraine.
This was one of those quarter finals you sat there thinking this game was more appropriate for the second round or even the group stages. Right from kick off Ukraine always appeared as though they would be eliminated here, and that the Italians would progress. I also sat there thinking that Switzerland (whom Ukraine defeated on penalties in the previous round) would probably have made a better fist of it. My reason for this thought was that the Swiss are an excellent defensive side. They did not concede any goals at the world cup in five games, and would have had more of a chance at containing the Italians. They had been knocked out though because they lacked attacking prowess even though Frei and Barnetta had been impressive at times, and then given the knock-out punch by lacking the bottle when it came down to penalties. They had been consistent all tournament and could have made quite a game of it. The Ukraine on the other hand had been inconsistent. An at times abject 4-0 loss to an on song Spain, a 4-0 demolition of a sorry Saudi Arabia, and a turgid 0-0 draw with the Tunisians reflected their group stages. They had to hope that the version of the Ukraine team was a Shevchenko on top form, backed up by an inspired Voronin and Kalinichenko, and a resolute defence. In short they had to play the game of their lives.
All thus far has been conjecture. Some would call it pointless conjecture. The fact of the matter is that Switzerland did not defeat the Ukraine, therefore let us not worry our little heads about these hypothetical scenarios and focus on the real deal. My head is and always will be full of hypothetical scenarios though I suppose, so forgive me when I occasionally drift into Fantasia Land!
So on to the match:
Italy attacked from the offset, Camoranesi with a dangerous run and shot on 4 minutes, followed by the opening goal on 6 as Zambrotta smashed in at the near post, Shovkovskiy managing to get a hand on it, but the power produced the goal. In truth Ukraine looked nervous from the offset and gave the Italians too much room. The last 30 minutes of the first half was very unmemorable with both sides managing only a couple of wayward efforts on goal. Shevchenko was being tightly marshalled by the Italian defence and only on rare occasions throughout the match did it seem he would trouble Italy.
Early second half showed some new life breathed into the game. Toni scuffed a shot before the Ukraine had their best spell of the match. Gusin's excellent header, and Gusev's shot from point-blank range, were both tremendously saved from Buffon. Buffon, as usual, was on fire. It could so easily have been the equaliser and a whole different ball game. Yet sport is a cruel beast and within minutes who would become victors became even more clear, as Toni broke his World Cup 2006 duck as he stooped low to head the Italians into a 2 goal lead. Totti the provider. Ukraine had another chance to pull one back, this time Gusin thwarted by the crossbar, indicating that this was just not going to be Ukraine's night. And then again, Toni added a third to put the icing on the cake, giving Italy an unassailable lead, tapping into an empty net after good work from Zambrotta.
Cannavaro was my man of the match with a sensational display at the heart of defence.
Italy, with a useful attack, a solid defence, and an amazing goalkeeper could go all the way. But Ukraine did have approximately 3 chances which could so easily have gone in, and this will give the Germans hope for their encounter. Ukraine go home, Shevchenko never quite delivering on the world stage, although lacking in service. They did do very well for a team at their first world cup, however they were aided by an easy group, followed by a not incredibly daunting second round tie.
This was one of those quarter finals you sat there thinking this game was more appropriate for the second round or even the group stages. Right from kick off Ukraine always appeared as though they would be eliminated here, and that the Italians would progress. I also sat there thinking that Switzerland (whom Ukraine defeated on penalties in the previous round) would probably have made a better fist of it. My reason for this thought was that the Swiss are an excellent defensive side. They did not concede any goals at the world cup in five games, and would have had more of a chance at containing the Italians. They had been knocked out though because they lacked attacking prowess even though Frei and Barnetta had been impressive at times, and then given the knock-out punch by lacking the bottle when it came down to penalties. They had been consistent all tournament and could have made quite a game of it. The Ukraine on the other hand had been inconsistent. An at times abject 4-0 loss to an on song Spain, a 4-0 demolition of a sorry Saudi Arabia, and a turgid 0-0 draw with the Tunisians reflected their group stages. They had to hope that the version of the Ukraine team was a Shevchenko on top form, backed up by an inspired Voronin and Kalinichenko, and a resolute defence. In short they had to play the game of their lives.
All thus far has been conjecture. Some would call it pointless conjecture. The fact of the matter is that Switzerland did not defeat the Ukraine, therefore let us not worry our little heads about these hypothetical scenarios and focus on the real deal. My head is and always will be full of hypothetical scenarios though I suppose, so forgive me when I occasionally drift into Fantasia Land!
So on to the match:
Italy attacked from the offset, Camoranesi with a dangerous run and shot on 4 minutes, followed by the opening goal on 6 as Zambrotta smashed in at the near post, Shovkovskiy managing to get a hand on it, but the power produced the goal. In truth Ukraine looked nervous from the offset and gave the Italians too much room. The last 30 minutes of the first half was very unmemorable with both sides managing only a couple of wayward efforts on goal. Shevchenko was being tightly marshalled by the Italian defence and only on rare occasions throughout the match did it seem he would trouble Italy.
Early second half showed some new life breathed into the game. Toni scuffed a shot before the Ukraine had their best spell of the match. Gusin's excellent header, and Gusev's shot from point-blank range, were both tremendously saved from Buffon. Buffon, as usual, was on fire. It could so easily have been the equaliser and a whole different ball game. Yet sport is a cruel beast and within minutes who would become victors became even more clear, as Toni broke his World Cup 2006 duck as he stooped low to head the Italians into a 2 goal lead. Totti the provider. Ukraine had another chance to pull one back, this time Gusin thwarted by the crossbar, indicating that this was just not going to be Ukraine's night. And then again, Toni added a third to put the icing on the cake, giving Italy an unassailable lead, tapping into an empty net after good work from Zambrotta.
Cannavaro was my man of the match with a sensational display at the heart of defence.
Italy, with a useful attack, a solid defence, and an amazing goalkeeper could go all the way. But Ukraine did have approximately 3 chances which could so easily have gone in, and this will give the Germans hope for their encounter. Ukraine go home, Shevchenko never quite delivering on the world stage, although lacking in service. They did do very well for a team at their first world cup, however they were aided by an easy group, followed by a not incredibly daunting second round tie.
Monday, July 03, 2006
Hosts Progress.
Germany 1-1 Argentina, 1-1 aet, 4-2 PSO
The first half saw the two sides negate each other, leaving both sides with few decent goalscoring opportunities. Possession changed hands frequently. Some people might have expected fireworks but more often than not when two big teams with big players are playing each other in one of the biggest games of their careers, you find what some people deem a boring match. My phrase of choice however, is, 'a fascinating / intriguing tussle'. The 'cat and mouse' chess game is still very interesting and enjoyable, especially watching the tension from both sides.
Overall the first half saw Argentina string together a better set of passes, probing gently for an opening, impressing in their general play, yet without spine when it came down to where it mattered. Germany didn't appear quite up to the races but they defended in numbers and emerged as the team who could have had been ahead at the half time whistle. Ballack had a header flash wide after a beautifully weighted shot from Schneider. The only other chances of note were Podolski's 25 yard free kick hit straight at the keeper - held at the second attempt, and Mertesacker's drive which steepled over the bar, denying him his second international goal. Tevez was the most impressive for Argentina, his nutmeg almost setting up a Sorin shot, only for Mertesacker's timely intervention.
The second half changed the game within minutes. Ayala scored with a bullet header from a Riquelme free kick. Neither Lehmann, nor Lahm standing on the line, were able to prevent the game's opening goal. The game livened up as the Germans needed to attack more to press for the equaliser, which inevitably in turn led to more openings at their own end. Ballack was unable to take advantage of Abbondanzieri failed to collect a cross, but still chances were at a premium. Maxi Rodriguez had the opportunity to improve his already excellent world cup but instead fired into the side netting.
A couple of key moments did occur in the last 20 minutes or so. Abbondanzieri was injured and had to be replaced by Franco. If there is one position the Argentinian squad lacks depth in it's in goal, Franco coming on for only his fourth cap. And how nervous he looked as he walked on the pitch. The other key was Pekerman's decision to replace Riquelme with Cambiasso and Crespo with Julio Cruz. The rationale was that Cambiasso as a holding midfielder would help Argentina hold onto the lead better than with Riquelme who would find it difficult to quell his attacking instincts. When Cambiasso came on, I said out loud (to myself of course as practically all games I have watched live with only myself for company!) "what the hell? this is a ridiculous decision. What happens if Germany do find an equaliser - how are Argentina going to find a winner in extra-time without Riquelme? And why is Julio Cruz coming on, surely it's time for the introduction of so-called wonder kid Messi. They are both strikers but surely Messi would be the better option?". I thought that there was the potential for Pekerman's negativity to bite him on the bum. And by God it did! It later emerged that Riquelme was tired. I still think a tired Riquelme should have remained on the pitch. I'm sure the Argentinian Press will have been mulling over these very same questions, with far more ferocity than I have. However I haven't been reading the Argentinian Press and so am unable to know the consensus of opinion. Still, the decisions seem a little strange, and their consequences were bad ones, leaving a slightly bitter taste in the mouth for their legion of fans.
Of course had Klose not notched up the all important equalising goal, his substitutions may have been classified as legendary, such is the tiniest dividing line between success and failure in the beautiful game.
With less than 10 minutes remaining Ballack floated in a cross, Borowski expertly flicked it on, and Klose headed in with aplomb. I had wondered only a few minutes earlier though why Borowski had come on for Schweinsteiger. Of course there is the fresh legs argument but that was a big call from Klinsmann. It obviously paid dividends though. Bringing on Odonkor for Schneider was a good sub to make. Odonkor is such a pacy player, with a great 100m sprint time, and he caused a number of problems for Argentina down the right flank.
And then it was extra time.
30 minutes of play that resembled the first 30. Both teams were eager not to make mistakes and were limited to long range efforts on goal.
And so penalties ensued.
Neither side had ever lost a world cup penalty shoot-out. But if any team inspires confidence in a penalty shoot out it is the Germans. They did not disappoint. 4 out of 4 for the Germans with clinical penalties. Even Ballack who had been nursing an injury towards the end of the game showed no signs of ever being likely to miss. Lehmann was the hero as he saved from both Ayala and Cambiasso. Ayala's was particularly weak, unable to score as he had done in 98 in the PSO against England.
The Germans were in delirium, the Argentinians despair. Argentina had probably played a bit better on the night, but how well you play is often irrelevant. Germany showed the better mental toughness in the PSO. Argentina go home after impressing at this world cup but ultimately having very little to show for it.
After the game Argentina were angry, and so some ugly scenes of the two sets of players being involved in some scrapping became obvious. Apparently sub Cufre was sent off in the melee afterwards.
The hosts dreams remain well and truly alive.
The first half saw the two sides negate each other, leaving both sides with few decent goalscoring opportunities. Possession changed hands frequently. Some people might have expected fireworks but more often than not when two big teams with big players are playing each other in one of the biggest games of their careers, you find what some people deem a boring match. My phrase of choice however, is, 'a fascinating / intriguing tussle'. The 'cat and mouse' chess game is still very interesting and enjoyable, especially watching the tension from both sides.
Overall the first half saw Argentina string together a better set of passes, probing gently for an opening, impressing in their general play, yet without spine when it came down to where it mattered. Germany didn't appear quite up to the races but they defended in numbers and emerged as the team who could have had been ahead at the half time whistle. Ballack had a header flash wide after a beautifully weighted shot from Schneider. The only other chances of note were Podolski's 25 yard free kick hit straight at the keeper - held at the second attempt, and Mertesacker's drive which steepled over the bar, denying him his second international goal. Tevez was the most impressive for Argentina, his nutmeg almost setting up a Sorin shot, only for Mertesacker's timely intervention.
The second half changed the game within minutes. Ayala scored with a bullet header from a Riquelme free kick. Neither Lehmann, nor Lahm standing on the line, were able to prevent the game's opening goal. The game livened up as the Germans needed to attack more to press for the equaliser, which inevitably in turn led to more openings at their own end. Ballack was unable to take advantage of Abbondanzieri failed to collect a cross, but still chances were at a premium. Maxi Rodriguez had the opportunity to improve his already excellent world cup but instead fired into the side netting.
A couple of key moments did occur in the last 20 minutes or so. Abbondanzieri was injured and had to be replaced by Franco. If there is one position the Argentinian squad lacks depth in it's in goal, Franco coming on for only his fourth cap. And how nervous he looked as he walked on the pitch. The other key was Pekerman's decision to replace Riquelme with Cambiasso and Crespo with Julio Cruz. The rationale was that Cambiasso as a holding midfielder would help Argentina hold onto the lead better than with Riquelme who would find it difficult to quell his attacking instincts. When Cambiasso came on, I said out loud (to myself of course as practically all games I have watched live with only myself for company!) "what the hell? this is a ridiculous decision. What happens if Germany do find an equaliser - how are Argentina going to find a winner in extra-time without Riquelme? And why is Julio Cruz coming on, surely it's time for the introduction of so-called wonder kid Messi. They are both strikers but surely Messi would be the better option?". I thought that there was the potential for Pekerman's negativity to bite him on the bum. And by God it did! It later emerged that Riquelme was tired. I still think a tired Riquelme should have remained on the pitch. I'm sure the Argentinian Press will have been mulling over these very same questions, with far more ferocity than I have. However I haven't been reading the Argentinian Press and so am unable to know the consensus of opinion. Still, the decisions seem a little strange, and their consequences were bad ones, leaving a slightly bitter taste in the mouth for their legion of fans.
Of course had Klose not notched up the all important equalising goal, his substitutions may have been classified as legendary, such is the tiniest dividing line between success and failure in the beautiful game.
With less than 10 minutes remaining Ballack floated in a cross, Borowski expertly flicked it on, and Klose headed in with aplomb. I had wondered only a few minutes earlier though why Borowski had come on for Schweinsteiger. Of course there is the fresh legs argument but that was a big call from Klinsmann. It obviously paid dividends though. Bringing on Odonkor for Schneider was a good sub to make. Odonkor is such a pacy player, with a great 100m sprint time, and he caused a number of problems for Argentina down the right flank.
And then it was extra time.
30 minutes of play that resembled the first 30. Both teams were eager not to make mistakes and were limited to long range efforts on goal.
And so penalties ensued.
Neither side had ever lost a world cup penalty shoot-out. But if any team inspires confidence in a penalty shoot out it is the Germans. They did not disappoint. 4 out of 4 for the Germans with clinical penalties. Even Ballack who had been nursing an injury towards the end of the game showed no signs of ever being likely to miss. Lehmann was the hero as he saved from both Ayala and Cambiasso. Ayala's was particularly weak, unable to score as he had done in 98 in the PSO against England.
The Germans were in delirium, the Argentinians despair. Argentina had probably played a bit better on the night, but how well you play is often irrelevant. Germany showed the better mental toughness in the PSO. Argentina go home after impressing at this world cup but ultimately having very little to show for it.
After the game Argentina were angry, and so some ugly scenes of the two sets of players being involved in some scrapping became obvious. Apparently sub Cufre was sent off in the melee afterwards.
The hosts dreams remain well and truly alive.
Friday, June 30, 2006
Quarter-finals are here!
FRIDAY 30 JUNE WILL SEE...
GERMANY - ARGENTINA:
A mammoth, massive, gigantic, huge, gargantuan, intriguing, exciting, fascinating, mouthwatering, orgasmic match-up. A repeat of both the 1986 and 1990 finals won by Argentina and Germany respectively. The hosts are in fine form, particularly on attack, and they come up against the magic of the Argentinians who entertain by the nature of the way they play the game. Argentinians extra squad depth with Tevez and Messi as likely substitutes could be seen to give them the edge, but then again Germany playing at home could be an even bigger advantage.
This is what the world cup is all about.
One of these teams will go home and the other will progress.
Shit, it's exciting isn't it?
Who do I want? I don't know - I have a lot of reasons to want neither to progress, and yet I enjoy watching both of them.
Who do I think? So hard to tell, hopefully the game will go to extra time though!
Italy - Ukraine.
Italy were rather lucky in their second round match, and they haven't exactly been inspiring at the world cup. But they defend well and like to sneak 1-0 wins. They have, on paper, the easiest quarter-final but Ukraine, appearing at their first tournament will have something to say about this. Maybe Shevchenko will properly fire for the first time at the tournament.
Should be interesting.
And who knows, maybe even more exciting than the other game, one can never be sure of these things. It is football after all!
GERMANY - ARGENTINA:
A mammoth, massive, gigantic, huge, gargantuan, intriguing, exciting, fascinating, mouthwatering, orgasmic match-up. A repeat of both the 1986 and 1990 finals won by Argentina and Germany respectively. The hosts are in fine form, particularly on attack, and they come up against the magic of the Argentinians who entertain by the nature of the way they play the game. Argentinians extra squad depth with Tevez and Messi as likely substitutes could be seen to give them the edge, but then again Germany playing at home could be an even bigger advantage.
This is what the world cup is all about.
One of these teams will go home and the other will progress.
Shit, it's exciting isn't it?
Who do I want? I don't know - I have a lot of reasons to want neither to progress, and yet I enjoy watching both of them.
Who do I think? So hard to tell, hopefully the game will go to extra time though!
Italy - Ukraine.
Italy were rather lucky in their second round match, and they haven't exactly been inspiring at the world cup. But they defend well and like to sneak 1-0 wins. They have, on paper, the easiest quarter-final but Ukraine, appearing at their first tournament will have something to say about this. Maybe Shevchenko will properly fire for the first time at the tournament.
Should be interesting.
And who knows, maybe even more exciting than the other game, one can never be sure of these things. It is football after all!
Spain underachieve...AGAIN!
France 3-1 Spain.
Once more Spain enter the World Cup as one of the favourites, once more they fall at an early stage. Going into their second round match with France, Spain were on top form and looking good, France had been playing like they were on borrowed time. However when you have a quality team, even if it's getting on in years, a good performance is only ever one game away.
France: Looked better than they have done for a long time. Henry was constantly caught offside but they looked dangerous going forward, particularly the young and exuberant Ribery. Thuram made the mistake of conceding the penalty with a silly foul but Ribery equalised with aplomb as he rounded the keeper and stroked home after a nice through ball from Viera, the ball eluding the desperate dives of Puyol and Pernia. France came out fighting at the start of the second half, Malouda's lob drawing a great save from Casillas. Viera headed in the second goal with less than 10 minutes remaining, and extra time looming. Then as Spain pushed for the equaliser Zidane found himself with the opportunity to make it 3, his forceful shot completing a happy night for the French. This sets up a quarter-final clash which will be a repeat of the 98 final, Brazil await.
Spain: Passed patiently, searching for the opening and were presented with a great chance as Pablo was felled in the box. Villa made no mistake from the spot with a perfectly taken penalty - low and hard in the botton left hand corner. It was Puyol who was to become villain as it was he who conceded the free kick from which Viera was ultimately to score. Henry was in a non menacing position chasing down the ball, possession looking likely to go the spanish way until a rash elbow from Puyol. Spain never quite looked the fast, threatening team they had done, their renowned midfield and attack not quite up to speed, despite their frenetic opening 20 minutes or so. Aragones brought on Joaquin and Garcia midway through the second period to reinvigorate his side who were looking second best, but neither of their efforts was enough, even Joaquin's shot into the side netting.
A very disappointing finish to the Spanish campaign, and Aragones picked up his only defeat at the helm of the national side since taking over after Euro 2004. Spanish sides may hold the champions league and the uefa cup, but their national team continue to flatter to deceive.
I was disappointed in the result for purely footballing reasons. I thought Spain deserved to be in the quarter final ahead of the French after the way they had played thus far, and because they are an exciting team going forward I would have looked forward more to their match-up with Brazil. It's also a bit of a shambles that the Ukraine who were hammered 4-0 by Spain progress further than their tormentors. But that's the nature of world cup footy.
It also meant that now 6 of the 8 quarter finalists are past winners, it would have been nice from my perspective if this was 5 out of 8 and Spain were still there.
Once more Spain enter the World Cup as one of the favourites, once more they fall at an early stage. Going into their second round match with France, Spain were on top form and looking good, France had been playing like they were on borrowed time. However when you have a quality team, even if it's getting on in years, a good performance is only ever one game away.
France: Looked better than they have done for a long time. Henry was constantly caught offside but they looked dangerous going forward, particularly the young and exuberant Ribery. Thuram made the mistake of conceding the penalty with a silly foul but Ribery equalised with aplomb as he rounded the keeper and stroked home after a nice through ball from Viera, the ball eluding the desperate dives of Puyol and Pernia. France came out fighting at the start of the second half, Malouda's lob drawing a great save from Casillas. Viera headed in the second goal with less than 10 minutes remaining, and extra time looming. Then as Spain pushed for the equaliser Zidane found himself with the opportunity to make it 3, his forceful shot completing a happy night for the French. This sets up a quarter-final clash which will be a repeat of the 98 final, Brazil await.
Spain: Passed patiently, searching for the opening and were presented with a great chance as Pablo was felled in the box. Villa made no mistake from the spot with a perfectly taken penalty - low and hard in the botton left hand corner. It was Puyol who was to become villain as it was he who conceded the free kick from which Viera was ultimately to score. Henry was in a non menacing position chasing down the ball, possession looking likely to go the spanish way until a rash elbow from Puyol. Spain never quite looked the fast, threatening team they had done, their renowned midfield and attack not quite up to speed, despite their frenetic opening 20 minutes or so. Aragones brought on Joaquin and Garcia midway through the second period to reinvigorate his side who were looking second best, but neither of their efforts was enough, even Joaquin's shot into the side netting.
A very disappointing finish to the Spanish campaign, and Aragones picked up his only defeat at the helm of the national side since taking over after Euro 2004. Spanish sides may hold the champions league and the uefa cup, but their national team continue to flatter to deceive.
I was disappointed in the result for purely footballing reasons. I thought Spain deserved to be in the quarter final ahead of the French after the way they had played thus far, and because they are an exciting team going forward I would have looked forward more to their match-up with Brazil. It's also a bit of a shambles that the Ukraine who were hammered 4-0 by Spain progress further than their tormentors. But that's the nature of world cup footy.
It also meant that now 6 of the 8 quarter finalists are past winners, it would have been nice from my perspective if this was 5 out of 8 and Spain were still there.
Thursday, June 29, 2006
Brazil 3-0 Ghana
An expected result, even if the game itself suggested the scoreline could have been otherwise. Ghana could not even become the first African team to score a goal against Brazil at a world cup.
Brazil: Always looked dangerous on attack, and were handed an early present as Ronaldo became the most prolific goalscorer in world cup finals history, as he expertly shimmied past Kingston after a through ball by Kaka. For most of the half though Brazil had to be content with defence, an aspect of their game which made them look vulnerable at times. However, Dida had a great game in goal and made the game turning save from Mensah's header at a corner. Fortuitously Brazil managed a second goal before the break as Cafu crossed, and Adrian tapped home. He was in an offside position but the officials got it wrong and the goal stood. Brazil sat back again in the second half, defending OK, but still relying heavily on Dida. After Ghana were reduced to 10 men with 10 minutes remaining, Brazil then created numerous opportunities and could have ended with 5 or 6 goals. Only one more was taken however as Ze Roberto also skilfully rounded the keeper to put the icing on the cake. 3-0 was not an accurate reflection of the game but Brazil are renowned for taking their chances and roll on into the quarters.
Ghana: Their defending was naive at times, in fact it was poor. They seemed to always want to play the offside trap, however this requires their flat backline to be synchronised, however at times one of the defenders didn't move up thus playing the Brazilians onside. This is what Paintsil did for Ronaldo's goal after 5 minutes. Ghana took about 20 minutes to get into the match, perhaps overawed by the big occasion, and feeling lost without Essien. However on attack Ghana looked dangerous. The final shot was often poor though, long range drives went over or wide, shots in the penalty were hit straight (and feebly) at Dida. Amoah and Gyan had the best of the chances but were unable to convert.
After Mensah's strong header was well saved by Dida with his legs only minutes before the half-time interval the killer blow arrived. Adriano scored from an offside position making Ghana's task almost impossible. What made it worse was that he appeared offside. The players, incensed, surrounded the ref, and coach Dujkovic was sent to the stands.
Still Ghana ploughed on in the second spell. However on many an occasion, as they looked good with the ball in a central position 20 or 30 yards from goal, with good options to the left and right, they opted for the harmless piledriver. This approach also revealed their naivety, with all their possession and chances in the second half goals should have accrued. After Gyan was sent off for a second yellow the Ghana defence crumbled and only heroics from Kingston kept the scoreline respectable.
The officials had a bit of a shocker. Brazil should probably have been awarded in the first half rather than Adriano receiving yellow, a number of offsides were wrong i.e. Brazil's second goal was actually offside, and Ronaldo being given offside when he wasn't. Overall not a great day for them.
Brazil: Always looked dangerous on attack, and were handed an early present as Ronaldo became the most prolific goalscorer in world cup finals history, as he expertly shimmied past Kingston after a through ball by Kaka. For most of the half though Brazil had to be content with defence, an aspect of their game which made them look vulnerable at times. However, Dida had a great game in goal and made the game turning save from Mensah's header at a corner. Fortuitously Brazil managed a second goal before the break as Cafu crossed, and Adrian tapped home. He was in an offside position but the officials got it wrong and the goal stood. Brazil sat back again in the second half, defending OK, but still relying heavily on Dida. After Ghana were reduced to 10 men with 10 minutes remaining, Brazil then created numerous opportunities and could have ended with 5 or 6 goals. Only one more was taken however as Ze Roberto also skilfully rounded the keeper to put the icing on the cake. 3-0 was not an accurate reflection of the game but Brazil are renowned for taking their chances and roll on into the quarters.
Ghana: Their defending was naive at times, in fact it was poor. They seemed to always want to play the offside trap, however this requires their flat backline to be synchronised, however at times one of the defenders didn't move up thus playing the Brazilians onside. This is what Paintsil did for Ronaldo's goal after 5 minutes. Ghana took about 20 minutes to get into the match, perhaps overawed by the big occasion, and feeling lost without Essien. However on attack Ghana looked dangerous. The final shot was often poor though, long range drives went over or wide, shots in the penalty were hit straight (and feebly) at Dida. Amoah and Gyan had the best of the chances but were unable to convert.
After Mensah's strong header was well saved by Dida with his legs only minutes before the half-time interval the killer blow arrived. Adriano scored from an offside position making Ghana's task almost impossible. What made it worse was that he appeared offside. The players, incensed, surrounded the ref, and coach Dujkovic was sent to the stands.
Still Ghana ploughed on in the second spell. However on many an occasion, as they looked good with the ball in a central position 20 or 30 yards from goal, with good options to the left and right, they opted for the harmless piledriver. This approach also revealed their naivety, with all their possession and chances in the second half goals should have accrued. After Gyan was sent off for a second yellow the Ghana defence crumbled and only heroics from Kingston kept the scoreline respectable.
The officials had a bit of a shocker. Brazil should probably have been awarded in the first half rather than Adriano receiving yellow, a number of offsides were wrong i.e. Brazil's second goal was actually offside, and Ronaldo being given offside when he wasn't. Overall not a great day for them.
Tuesday, June 27, 2006
Final round 2 previews.
Not many goals in the second round games thus far, I have a feeling this might change tonight.
Brazil vs Ghana.
Not sure who I want to win this one. I always like to see an African team make the quarterfinals, however it would be a shame to see such a great team as Brazil get knocked out at this relatively early stage. Robinho will be missing through injury for Brazi. More crucially Ghanain lynchpin Essien is suspended for the clash which will be a huge blow. There could be a few goals in this one, both teams love to attack.
Spain - France.
Hopefully Spain will win this one, they have a great squad and an exciting team whilst France have looked rather abject thus far. It's a one off game though and anything can happen, especially as France welcome back Zidane for the game.
Brazil vs Ghana.
Not sure who I want to win this one. I always like to see an African team make the quarterfinals, however it would be a shame to see such a great team as Brazil get knocked out at this relatively early stage. Robinho will be missing through injury for Brazi. More crucially Ghanain lynchpin Essien is suspended for the clash which will be a huge blow. There could be a few goals in this one, both teams love to attack.
Spain - France.
Hopefully Spain will win this one, they have a great squad and an exciting team whilst France have looked rather abject thus far. It's a one off game though and anything can happen, especially as France welcome back Zidane for the game.
Ukraine joy, Swiss despair.
Ukraine 0-0 Switzerland, 0-0 a.e.t, 3-0 PSO
This was possibly the most boring game of the world cup with few decent chances, and only one offside in 120 minutes of action typifying both teams emphasis on defence. Both Shevchenko and Frei, star men of their respective teams, struck the crossbar - Shevchenko with a glancing header, Frei with a hard struck free kick.
Penalties seemed inevitable and it was Ukraine who showed the better nerves. Despite Shevchenko having Ukraine's first penalty saved they converted their next three while Switzerland converted none of theirs. Barnetta was unlucky as his struck the crossbar but Streller and Cabanas both hit poor efforts leaving Shovkovskiy with comfortable saves.
Very disappointing for the Swiss who become the first team to be eliminated at any world cup finals without conceding in open play. I was hoping they could progress if only for the coach Koebi Kuhn who appears such a genial character. Many of the Swiss team impressed at the world cup, none more so than Barnetta.
The referee took reffing to another extreme. Whilst other refs have been criticised for handing out too many yellow cards, this one was very reticent to show any when perhaps a few were in order. Can't anyone get the balance right?
This was possibly the most boring game of the world cup with few decent chances, and only one offside in 120 minutes of action typifying both teams emphasis on defence. Both Shevchenko and Frei, star men of their respective teams, struck the crossbar - Shevchenko with a glancing header, Frei with a hard struck free kick.
Penalties seemed inevitable and it was Ukraine who showed the better nerves. Despite Shevchenko having Ukraine's first penalty saved they converted their next three while Switzerland converted none of theirs. Barnetta was unlucky as his struck the crossbar but Streller and Cabanas both hit poor efforts leaving Shovkovskiy with comfortable saves.
Very disappointing for the Swiss who become the first team to be eliminated at any world cup finals without conceding in open play. I was hoping they could progress if only for the coach Koebi Kuhn who appears such a genial character. Many of the Swiss team impressed at the world cup, none more so than Barnetta.
The referee took reffing to another extreme. Whilst other refs have been criticised for handing out too many yellow cards, this one was very reticent to show any when perhaps a few were in order. Can't anyone get the balance right?
Italy 1-0 Australia
An absorbing, enthralling contest decided by a last minute penalty.
Italy: Played with by far the least possession but did their usual trick of defending expertly, looking to counterattack and sneaking a 1-0 win. Luca Toni was presented with a few chances, none of which he was able to dispatch. Fabio Cannavaro had an immense, immaculate game in defence, and Gattuso gave his usual tigerish display. At times Italy looked rattled though, and could be said to be fortunate. Their last second penalty was debatable. The sending off of Materazzi was probably fair as he was perceived to be the last man. It was far less clearcut however than the incident which should have seen Heinze shown the red against Mexico.
Australia: Didn't take advantage of their one man advantage and their wealth of possession, demonstrating that against top class opposition they lack penetration. Most of the team generally played well, Scott Chipperfield was particularly good, and Viduka again led the line valiantly, but without Harry Kewell they missed one player who can win a game in a moment. Neill may be seen as the villain after it was he who conceded the penalty. Schwarzer had an excellent game, tipping over on a couple of occasions and making one fantastic save with his legs from Toni when it appeared destined to be a goal.
Italy: Played with by far the least possession but did their usual trick of defending expertly, looking to counterattack and sneaking a 1-0 win. Luca Toni was presented with a few chances, none of which he was able to dispatch. Fabio Cannavaro had an immense, immaculate game in defence, and Gattuso gave his usual tigerish display. At times Italy looked rattled though, and could be said to be fortunate. Their last second penalty was debatable. The sending off of Materazzi was probably fair as he was perceived to be the last man. It was far less clearcut however than the incident which should have seen Heinze shown the red against Mexico.
Australia: Didn't take advantage of their one man advantage and their wealth of possession, demonstrating that against top class opposition they lack penetration. Most of the team generally played well, Scott Chipperfield was particularly good, and Viduka again led the line valiantly, but without Harry Kewell they missed one player who can win a game in a moment. Neill may be seen as the villain after it was he who conceded the penalty. Schwarzer had an excellent game, tipping over on a couple of occasions and making one fantastic save with his legs from Toni when it appeared destined to be a goal.
Aussie heartbreak: A RANT !!
First please permit me to shake off my objectivity and rant.
I am pretty gutted about the Aussies loss. I don't really know why but they have been one of the teams I have been supporting at World Cup 2006. Maybe because they are an underdog with great fighting spirit. Maybe it's neighbourly affection. It is also no doubt partly in the case of the second round match because I really do not like Italy who I have always considered to be diving, cheating scum. My dislike is not in the same league as my dislike of Argentina or Germany but there is a dislike there nevertheless. I don't like the Aussie rugby and cricket teams, but I do like the Socceroos, even if Harry Kewell who screwed Leeds over is a member of the squad. I even celebrated his goal against Croatia.
What is particularly gutting is that: Australia were not outclassed, Australia were not given a deserved beating, Australia were involved in an absorbing and close contest that was ultimately decided by a debatable penalty. There are those who argue both ways. Penalties are given for trips, but was it a trip? Grosso fell over Lucas Neill's prostrate figure, it was admittedly a hard one to interpret but whether the referee got it right or wrong (and I still think from my perspective it was wrong), how hard is it to lose with the very last kick of the game.
I so wanted extra time. The Italians with 10 men would have been wilting, Aussies would have increased the pressure. The Italians outstanding defence may well have stood firm but we will never know. The drama of penalties may have eventuated but we did not get the chance to see.
It was this ref who was in charge when Australia overcame Uruguay on penalties to get to the world cup, it was at this stage 4 years ago when an underdog coached by Guus Hiddink broke Italian hearts (ironically I was rooting for Italy on that day, how much luck did the Koreans have back in 02?). These were good portents for the Aussies. Although there are good portents for Italians overall. Last time their league was embroiled in Scandal was 82 when, yes you've guessed it, they last won the world cup.
I feel so sorry for the Aussie boys, the Aussie supporters, the ockers and the Aussie women.
This is the worst I have felt during the World Cup so far.
Those fans who support Australia and Leeds United (there are many of them), have had a pretty gutting year. But none of the events in Germany will come close to those at Millennium stadium on May 21st 2006.
Australia can hold their heads high after this world cup. High and proud.And then I can go back to snarling at the likes of George Gregan and Brett Lee!
I am pretty gutted about the Aussies loss. I don't really know why but they have been one of the teams I have been supporting at World Cup 2006. Maybe because they are an underdog with great fighting spirit. Maybe it's neighbourly affection. It is also no doubt partly in the case of the second round match because I really do not like Italy who I have always considered to be diving, cheating scum. My dislike is not in the same league as my dislike of Argentina or Germany but there is a dislike there nevertheless. I don't like the Aussie rugby and cricket teams, but I do like the Socceroos, even if Harry Kewell who screwed Leeds over is a member of the squad. I even celebrated his goal against Croatia.
What is particularly gutting is that: Australia were not outclassed, Australia were not given a deserved beating, Australia were involved in an absorbing and close contest that was ultimately decided by a debatable penalty. There are those who argue both ways. Penalties are given for trips, but was it a trip? Grosso fell over Lucas Neill's prostrate figure, it was admittedly a hard one to interpret but whether the referee got it right or wrong (and I still think from my perspective it was wrong), how hard is it to lose with the very last kick of the game.
I so wanted extra time. The Italians with 10 men would have been wilting, Aussies would have increased the pressure. The Italians outstanding defence may well have stood firm but we will never know. The drama of penalties may have eventuated but we did not get the chance to see.
It was this ref who was in charge when Australia overcame Uruguay on penalties to get to the world cup, it was at this stage 4 years ago when an underdog coached by Guus Hiddink broke Italian hearts (ironically I was rooting for Italy on that day, how much luck did the Koreans have back in 02?). These were good portents for the Aussies. Although there are good portents for Italians overall. Last time their league was embroiled in Scandal was 82 when, yes you've guessed it, they last won the world cup.
I feel so sorry for the Aussie boys, the Aussie supporters, the ockers and the Aussie women.
This is the worst I have felt during the World Cup so far.
Those fans who support Australia and Leeds United (there are many of them), have had a pretty gutting year. But none of the events in Germany will come close to those at Millennium stadium on May 21st 2006.
Australia can hold their heads high after this world cup. High and proud.And then I can go back to snarling at the likes of George Gregan and Brett Lee!
Tonight's previews:
Aussie - Italy
Most would expect an Italian win given their personnel, their ranking and their history. They have won the world cup on more than one occasion and seem to be a constant figure in the round of 16. Aussie on the other hand are in their second world cup and in the round of 16 for the first time. They do have a good squad though and Guus Hiddink is a wily campaigner. However I expect it to be close and I really think there is a potential for an upset on the cards. I hope so anyway!
On the injury front, Kewell is struggling with an injury and may not start, Nesta is ruled out.
Also: can Viduka finally find his goalscoring form, he has been playing well as the lone striker but would no doubt love a goal.
Swiss - Ukraine:
Should be tight. It's the clash of Frei vs Shevchenko, both renowned goalscorers. Switzerland haven't conceded a goal yet at WC 06 but they are without Senderos. Ukraine have been criticised at times but this is the moment for Voronin and Kalinichenko to step up, they have looked dangerous at times, they need to do so again. They do have 2 defenders suspended however.
One of the four second round matches has gone to extra time. None of them have reached penalties. Is tonight the night where all this changes? Or will the trend continue? Tune in and find out!
Most would expect an Italian win given their personnel, their ranking and their history. They have won the world cup on more than one occasion and seem to be a constant figure in the round of 16. Aussie on the other hand are in their second world cup and in the round of 16 for the first time. They do have a good squad though and Guus Hiddink is a wily campaigner. However I expect it to be close and I really think there is a potential for an upset on the cards. I hope so anyway!
On the injury front, Kewell is struggling with an injury and may not start, Nesta is ruled out.
Also: can Viduka finally find his goalscoring form, he has been playing well as the lone striker but would no doubt love a goal.
Swiss - Ukraine:
Should be tight. It's the clash of Frei vs Shevchenko, both renowned goalscorers. Switzerland haven't conceded a goal yet at WC 06 but they are without Senderos. Ukraine have been criticised at times but this is the moment for Voronin and Kalinichenko to step up, they have looked dangerous at times, they need to do so again. They do have 2 defenders suspended however.
One of the four second round matches has gone to extra time. None of them have reached penalties. Is tonight the night where all this changes? Or will the trend continue? Tune in and find out!
A war of attrition.
Portugal 1-0 Holland.
A match that promised so much. 2 heavyweights battling it out to reach the last 8. 2 teams with so much promise going forward, with great coaches. We did get to see some of this much vaunted attack but instead the after match analysis has tended to focus on the 4 red cards, a world cup finals record.
Referee Ivanov
Sepp Blatter has criticised Ivanov for his performance, and in some ways I agree. He was a bit too quick to caution the players, not really adopting the common sense approach that passions will run high and we can afford to be a little lenient. However red cards did seem inevitable in this clash as players came to blows and players lunged in with the tackles. Figo is also lucky not to have received a red card for headbutting. The commentator expressed thoughts that FIFA would look at the incident and may consider imposing a suspension, however I was proved correct in my thoughts that FIFA would choose not to intervene because Ivanov had seen the situation, and had meted out a punishment. I was right, this was exactly their standpoint. I don't actually agree with this standpoint because referee's can get punishments wrong and the high powered technology can reveal for all to see exactly what occurred. So yes, a bad tempered affair with 16 flashing yellows including 8 for the sent off men who were all given their marching orders for second bookable offences rather than straight reds.
Portugal: Were under the cosh right from the start but got the only goal of the game against the run of play. And what a brilliant goal it was too! After some intricate build-up play Deco sent the ball inside the penalty area, Pauleta laid the ball off to Maniche who brilliantly shimmied to create space and cracked the ball home much to his delight. They started to take some control of the match only for Christiano Ronaldo to succumb to injury. He tried to run it off but ultimately he left the field in tears. He is expected to recover for the England clash though, a match he describes as "very special" because he plays in England with Manchester United. They received their first red card at the end of the first half: the only red card there should be absolutely no doubts about having received two yellow cards for a crude challenge and a deliberate handball, but who could have so easily already had a second booking and thus his marching orders. Scolari reacted to the red card by withdrawing striker Pauleta for more of a midfield enforcer in Petit. In the second half Portugal also had to defend a lot as Holland pressed for the equaliser, but for the most part they did their duties admirably as Ricardo did well in goal and the rest of the defence kept it reasonably tight. Deco's red card and subsequent suspension will be a huge loss for the Portugese in their match against England as he is such a crucial figure for the team.
Holland had the better of the goalscoring chances. Early on both Van Bommel and Van Persie had shots narrowly miss which they were made to rue as Maniche scored the only goal of the game. Van Persie again came incredibly close before half-time, and Van der Sar kept the margin at one with an excellent save from Pauleta at point-blank range. In the second half Holland looked to make their man advantage count, Phillip Cocu smashing into the crossbar from close range in the unluckiest moment of the game. Van Bommel hit a vicious long range effort that Ricardo did well to save, and in the 81st minute Kuyt had a great chance, one on one with Ricardo the chance was smothered, Kuyt should probably have flicked it to his left to go round the keeper which would have left him merely needing to stroke the ball home. His legs weren't in the best position though as they were a little too outstretched to make it comfortable. Still, he should have done better. Holland had more than double the shots of Portugal and played really well offensively. Regardless, and unfortunately for them, they are eliminated.
The Holland side are young, inexperienced and talented. Van Basten made the tough call to leave most of the experienced players behind and go with youth. It could have paid off. He is a young, talented manager, and should he remain at the helm will be a big force in Euro 2008 and World Cup 2010. I will question one thing though. At the eleventh hour with Holland desperately needing a goal, why did Van Basten refuse to even give Ruud Van Nistlerooy on the bench, cutting a forlorn figure? I know they had a bit of a spat/chat midweek which was leaked to the media but here they were in the round of 16, about to get eliminated, and the immense scoring prowess of Van Nistlerooy was never even called upon. Strange. But there we have it. No more Holland at World Cup 2006!
A match that promised so much. 2 heavyweights battling it out to reach the last 8. 2 teams with so much promise going forward, with great coaches. We did get to see some of this much vaunted attack but instead the after match analysis has tended to focus on the 4 red cards, a world cup finals record.
Referee Ivanov
Sepp Blatter has criticised Ivanov for his performance, and in some ways I agree. He was a bit too quick to caution the players, not really adopting the common sense approach that passions will run high and we can afford to be a little lenient. However red cards did seem inevitable in this clash as players came to blows and players lunged in with the tackles. Figo is also lucky not to have received a red card for headbutting. The commentator expressed thoughts that FIFA would look at the incident and may consider imposing a suspension, however I was proved correct in my thoughts that FIFA would choose not to intervene because Ivanov had seen the situation, and had meted out a punishment. I was right, this was exactly their standpoint. I don't actually agree with this standpoint because referee's can get punishments wrong and the high powered technology can reveal for all to see exactly what occurred. So yes, a bad tempered affair with 16 flashing yellows including 8 for the sent off men who were all given their marching orders for second bookable offences rather than straight reds.
Portugal: Were under the cosh right from the start but got the only goal of the game against the run of play. And what a brilliant goal it was too! After some intricate build-up play Deco sent the ball inside the penalty area, Pauleta laid the ball off to Maniche who brilliantly shimmied to create space and cracked the ball home much to his delight. They started to take some control of the match only for Christiano Ronaldo to succumb to injury. He tried to run it off but ultimately he left the field in tears. He is expected to recover for the England clash though, a match he describes as "very special" because he plays in England with Manchester United. They received their first red card at the end of the first half: the only red card there should be absolutely no doubts about having received two yellow cards for a crude challenge and a deliberate handball, but who could have so easily already had a second booking and thus his marching orders. Scolari reacted to the red card by withdrawing striker Pauleta for more of a midfield enforcer in Petit. In the second half Portugal also had to defend a lot as Holland pressed for the equaliser, but for the most part they did their duties admirably as Ricardo did well in goal and the rest of the defence kept it reasonably tight. Deco's red card and subsequent suspension will be a huge loss for the Portugese in their match against England as he is such a crucial figure for the team.
Holland had the better of the goalscoring chances. Early on both Van Bommel and Van Persie had shots narrowly miss which they were made to rue as Maniche scored the only goal of the game. Van Persie again came incredibly close before half-time, and Van der Sar kept the margin at one with an excellent save from Pauleta at point-blank range. In the second half Holland looked to make their man advantage count, Phillip Cocu smashing into the crossbar from close range in the unluckiest moment of the game. Van Bommel hit a vicious long range effort that Ricardo did well to save, and in the 81st minute Kuyt had a great chance, one on one with Ricardo the chance was smothered, Kuyt should probably have flicked it to his left to go round the keeper which would have left him merely needing to stroke the ball home. His legs weren't in the best position though as they were a little too outstretched to make it comfortable. Still, he should have done better. Holland had more than double the shots of Portugal and played really well offensively. Regardless, and unfortunately for them, they are eliminated.
The Holland side are young, inexperienced and talented. Van Basten made the tough call to leave most of the experienced players behind and go with youth. It could have paid off. He is a young, talented manager, and should he remain at the helm will be a big force in Euro 2008 and World Cup 2010. I will question one thing though. At the eleventh hour with Holland desperately needing a goal, why did Van Basten refuse to even give Ruud Van Nistlerooy on the bench, cutting a forlorn figure? I know they had a bit of a spat/chat midweek which was leaked to the media but here they were in the round of 16, about to get eliminated, and the immense scoring prowess of Van Nistlerooy was never even called upon. Strange. But there we have it. No more Holland at World Cup 2006!
England scrape the win.
England 1-0 Ecuador
A tight, uninspiring game was eventually separated by one moment of magic as England set up a repeat of the Euro 2004 semi-final.
England, quite frankly, were pretty shocking. They created sparse decent opportunities and their defending left quite a bit to be desired. To start off, the formation and tactics were a bit of a shambles. Rooney was left isolated up front, he put in the hard yards with a very committed performance but it was not the role for him. Strangely England had a tendency to pump balls long, bypassing the midfield. This is a tactic which can almost work with Crouch in that position, but not Rooney. Against Sweden in the first half, playing 4-4-2, even after Crouch had replaced Owen, England passed the ball around and cleverly created openings by working their way up through the midfield. This seemed to suit the team, however Sven in his wisdom decided on 4-5-1 (or 4-1-4-1 to be more precise) for the Ecuador game as Rooney often chased fruitlessly after punts from the defence. Rooney is fantastic when he plays that deep lying striker role, he creates a link between midfield and attack, he goes off on strong runs, he shoots dangerously from distance, and he helps create opportunities for his team mates. Left to lead the line on his own, he looks like a lost little boy. Carrick did well in his defensive midfield role but should he have that role? Do England need that role? Should it just be left to Gerrard and Lampard to marshall the centre of midfield or are there other solutions?
The England defence looked shaky at times, Terry had a bit of a nightmare on a couple of occasions, the first of which setting up Ecuador for the perfect opportunity to open the scoring only for a great block by Ashley Cole who had come haring back to resurrect the situation. Hargreaves had another good game at the atypical position of right back to demonstrate why he is in the squad. Lampard had a couple of magnificent chances in the second half, one in which he should have shot, instead trying to lay it off for Rooney only to succeed in giving away possession. The other was being in the perfect position in the penalty area with quite a bit of space, and blazing over with a shot reminiscent of a rugby conversion! Lampard who has scored so many goals for Chelsea is pretty down on confidence it seems, and just needs 1 goal to open the floodgates in my humble opinion.
The winning goal was a trademark Beckham free kick as he rolled back the years to curl the ball past Mora's outstretched hands, becoming the first Englishman to score in 3 different world cups. As I said before, he probably merits his position simply for his prowess at the dead ball situation alone. As apart from that he actually had a terrible game. At half-time Beckham had the statistic of a measly 44% passing accuracy as only 11/25 passes actually found their intended target. Towards the end of the game Beckham was visibly struggling but still Sven kept him on, waiting till there was 3 minutes to go before introducing Aaron Lennon. (Aaron Lennon: now there is a man who should be given more game time than he is!). Sven thinks England are getting "better and better and better" but I see no evidence of this myself!
Ultimately England played poorly and won. This is the sign of a good team, although perhaps it reflects the nature of the opposition rather than an innate winning mentality. Time will reveal all!
Ecuador: Looked reasonable in the first half. Tenorio could so easily have scored when he found himself one-on-one with Robinson. The keeper appeared beaten but as mentioned before Ashley Cole came in with a life saving deflection. Ecuador played with two up front as Tenorio and Delgado tried their best to terrorise England. In the second half Ecuador didn't create much of note, Castillo having one good shot that Robinson had to be alert to. They were probably eager to defend and take England to extra time. They lacked aggression at times and to be honest were a little disappointing overall.
A tight, uninspiring game was eventually separated by one moment of magic as England set up a repeat of the Euro 2004 semi-final.
England, quite frankly, were pretty shocking. They created sparse decent opportunities and their defending left quite a bit to be desired. To start off, the formation and tactics were a bit of a shambles. Rooney was left isolated up front, he put in the hard yards with a very committed performance but it was not the role for him. Strangely England had a tendency to pump balls long, bypassing the midfield. This is a tactic which can almost work with Crouch in that position, but not Rooney. Against Sweden in the first half, playing 4-4-2, even after Crouch had replaced Owen, England passed the ball around and cleverly created openings by working their way up through the midfield. This seemed to suit the team, however Sven in his wisdom decided on 4-5-1 (or 4-1-4-1 to be more precise) for the Ecuador game as Rooney often chased fruitlessly after punts from the defence. Rooney is fantastic when he plays that deep lying striker role, he creates a link between midfield and attack, he goes off on strong runs, he shoots dangerously from distance, and he helps create opportunities for his team mates. Left to lead the line on his own, he looks like a lost little boy. Carrick did well in his defensive midfield role but should he have that role? Do England need that role? Should it just be left to Gerrard and Lampard to marshall the centre of midfield or are there other solutions?
The England defence looked shaky at times, Terry had a bit of a nightmare on a couple of occasions, the first of which setting up Ecuador for the perfect opportunity to open the scoring only for a great block by Ashley Cole who had come haring back to resurrect the situation. Hargreaves had another good game at the atypical position of right back to demonstrate why he is in the squad. Lampard had a couple of magnificent chances in the second half, one in which he should have shot, instead trying to lay it off for Rooney only to succeed in giving away possession. The other was being in the perfect position in the penalty area with quite a bit of space, and blazing over with a shot reminiscent of a rugby conversion! Lampard who has scored so many goals for Chelsea is pretty down on confidence it seems, and just needs 1 goal to open the floodgates in my humble opinion.
The winning goal was a trademark Beckham free kick as he rolled back the years to curl the ball past Mora's outstretched hands, becoming the first Englishman to score in 3 different world cups. As I said before, he probably merits his position simply for his prowess at the dead ball situation alone. As apart from that he actually had a terrible game. At half-time Beckham had the statistic of a measly 44% passing accuracy as only 11/25 passes actually found their intended target. Towards the end of the game Beckham was visibly struggling but still Sven kept him on, waiting till there was 3 minutes to go before introducing Aaron Lennon. (Aaron Lennon: now there is a man who should be given more game time than he is!). Sven thinks England are getting "better and better and better" but I see no evidence of this myself!
Ultimately England played poorly and won. This is the sign of a good team, although perhaps it reflects the nature of the opposition rather than an innate winning mentality. Time will reveal all!
Ecuador: Looked reasonable in the first half. Tenorio could so easily have scored when he found himself one-on-one with Robinson. The keeper appeared beaten but as mentioned before Ashley Cole came in with a life saving deflection. Ecuador played with two up front as Tenorio and Delgado tried their best to terrorise England. In the second half Ecuador didn't create much of note, Castillo having one good shot that Robinson had to be alert to. They were probably eager to defend and take England to extra time. They lacked aggression at times and to be honest were a little disappointing overall.
Monday, June 26, 2006
Tonight's second round previews.
England v Ecuador.
The leaked news (if indeed it is true) is that Sven is going to play 4-5-1 with Carrick to play the holding midfield role, Crouch to drop to the bench, and someone like Gerrard to play a more attacking role just behind lone striker Rooney. Hargreaves is supposedly taking over from Carragher at right back. Ferdinand should be fit to start.
I don't like this news. I still think England should well because the class of their players will ultimately pull through, but I'll tell you what I don't like about it.
1) Why is Hargreaves playing at right back instead of Carragher? Hargreaves is a player in the defensive midfield role and it is this job he performs for Bayern Munich. We got a chance to see Hargreaves in this role against Sweden and he did a good job, much better than the many critics expected. Carragher is a natural defender, he has filled in at right back for Liverpool and England before. Part of the rationale is thought to be that Hargreaves will be able to help out Beckham more on the right. Sven's obsession with Beckham has obviously led to playing Hargreaves out of position. Some have suggested this means Beckham should be dropped but I'd keep him in there if only for his dead ball delivery. Players should not be played out of position unless in the direst of circumstances (Kevin Blackwell are you listening, do you sleep with Sven or something?) Carrick is a good player and passes well but if we are to have a holding midfielder I'd prefer to see Hargreaves retain his spot, and Carragher his.
2) 4-5-1? Personally I would have Crouch in the lineup ahead of Carrick. Crouch has scored 6 goals in his last 10 internationals, he has proved reasonably effective thus far and there is no reason to suggest he will be unable to partner Rooney. In fact he did so against Sweden after Owen had crawled off the pitch. It is also not ideal to keep changing formations. When everyone is guessing how England will lineup it really is no good. We should have a first team properly sorted, and emphasis should be on getting it right. This formation also means that one of the midfield will be pushed forward, probably Gerrard. Whilst he should be able to do quite well in this role it would be a waste of his talents which we'd much rather see patrolling the midfield.
I do think England should have too much for Ecuador but even if the match is a 4-0 win I will still have doubts over this chopping and changing formation. Ecuador welcome back the players they rested for the Germany match and they should give England a game. Ecuador have been pleasing on the eye this world cup and have proved to be a bit of a surprise package. Watch out for the likes of Delgado, Carlos Tenoria, Valencia, Hurtado and Espinoza. They are the key. Ecuador will likely play a wide game.
If you are an England fan put up you're hand if you are worried. Surely you don't want to see England fall to one of the minnows of world football. Will the English be rueing Sven's apparent desperation or will a big quarter-final match-up with Holland or Portugal be in the offing? England are the team facing pressure with the team expected to win, can Ecuador instead muster a huge surprise?
Holland v Portugal.
HUGE HUGE GAME. This is the kind of game that should be gracing a quarter or even a semi-final and here we have it in the round of 16. Both teams have quality throughout the side and both love to attack. This could suggest that a lot of goals are in the offing but who knows? One thing is for sure, this is probably the most eagerly awaited second round match up. One of these teams will be going home, what a shame. Both sides have looked impressive in the group stages. Can Scolari increase his run of 10 consecutive world cup finals matches victories? Can Holland fight the portents of history that suggest Portugal will win? Well Deco, Ronaldo, Figo and Pauleta of Portugal and Robben, Van Der Sar, Schneider and Van Persie of Holland (to name but a few) will be going at it hammer and tong. Apparently Van Basten has had a bit of a public spat with Van Nistlerooy who Van Basten feels has not lived up to expectations. He will consider playing Kuyt instead but may end up fixing on Van Nistlerooy. Both sides should be fresh after leaving out a few men in their final group matches. Both sides have huge respect for each other.
What will eventuate?
This has the potential to be the best, most explosive match of the world cup to date. But having said that they will probably now fight out a goal-less draw!
This game is a mouth-watering prospect. I would hate to pick a winner, so I won't! Hopefully we will see extra time though.
The leaked news (if indeed it is true) is that Sven is going to play 4-5-1 with Carrick to play the holding midfield role, Crouch to drop to the bench, and someone like Gerrard to play a more attacking role just behind lone striker Rooney. Hargreaves is supposedly taking over from Carragher at right back. Ferdinand should be fit to start.
I don't like this news. I still think England should well because the class of their players will ultimately pull through, but I'll tell you what I don't like about it.
1) Why is Hargreaves playing at right back instead of Carragher? Hargreaves is a player in the defensive midfield role and it is this job he performs for Bayern Munich. We got a chance to see Hargreaves in this role against Sweden and he did a good job, much better than the many critics expected. Carragher is a natural defender, he has filled in at right back for Liverpool and England before. Part of the rationale is thought to be that Hargreaves will be able to help out Beckham more on the right. Sven's obsession with Beckham has obviously led to playing Hargreaves out of position. Some have suggested this means Beckham should be dropped but I'd keep him in there if only for his dead ball delivery. Players should not be played out of position unless in the direst of circumstances (Kevin Blackwell are you listening, do you sleep with Sven or something?) Carrick is a good player and passes well but if we are to have a holding midfielder I'd prefer to see Hargreaves retain his spot, and Carragher his.
2) 4-5-1? Personally I would have Crouch in the lineup ahead of Carrick. Crouch has scored 6 goals in his last 10 internationals, he has proved reasonably effective thus far and there is no reason to suggest he will be unable to partner Rooney. In fact he did so against Sweden after Owen had crawled off the pitch. It is also not ideal to keep changing formations. When everyone is guessing how England will lineup it really is no good. We should have a first team properly sorted, and emphasis should be on getting it right. This formation also means that one of the midfield will be pushed forward, probably Gerrard. Whilst he should be able to do quite well in this role it would be a waste of his talents which we'd much rather see patrolling the midfield.
I do think England should have too much for Ecuador but even if the match is a 4-0 win I will still have doubts over this chopping and changing formation. Ecuador welcome back the players they rested for the Germany match and they should give England a game. Ecuador have been pleasing on the eye this world cup and have proved to be a bit of a surprise package. Watch out for the likes of Delgado, Carlos Tenoria, Valencia, Hurtado and Espinoza. They are the key. Ecuador will likely play a wide game.
If you are an England fan put up you're hand if you are worried. Surely you don't want to see England fall to one of the minnows of world football. Will the English be rueing Sven's apparent desperation or will a big quarter-final match-up with Holland or Portugal be in the offing? England are the team facing pressure with the team expected to win, can Ecuador instead muster a huge surprise?
Holland v Portugal.
HUGE HUGE GAME. This is the kind of game that should be gracing a quarter or even a semi-final and here we have it in the round of 16. Both teams have quality throughout the side and both love to attack. This could suggest that a lot of goals are in the offing but who knows? One thing is for sure, this is probably the most eagerly awaited second round match up. One of these teams will be going home, what a shame. Both sides have looked impressive in the group stages. Can Scolari increase his run of 10 consecutive world cup finals matches victories? Can Holland fight the portents of history that suggest Portugal will win? Well Deco, Ronaldo, Figo and Pauleta of Portugal and Robben, Van Der Sar, Schneider and Van Persie of Holland (to name but a few) will be going at it hammer and tong. Apparently Van Basten has had a bit of a public spat with Van Nistlerooy who Van Basten feels has not lived up to expectations. He will consider playing Kuyt instead but may end up fixing on Van Nistlerooy. Both sides should be fresh after leaving out a few men in their final group matches. Both sides have huge respect for each other.
What will eventuate?
This has the potential to be the best, most explosive match of the world cup to date. But having said that they will probably now fight out a goal-less draw!
This game is a mouth-watering prospect. I would hate to pick a winner, so I won't! Hopefully we will see extra time though.
The English Show Ponies!
Browsing on the net I found this little article demonstrating the largesse of the English stars. This is the kind of story that can get you rooting for the underdogm for Ecuador to win for their impoverished nation and for England to lose to stick it up the English players who are on crazy wages which they throw haphazardly around!
It is not so much a game of two halves as one of two other halves.
As Coleen McLoughlin, Wayne Rooney's girlfriend, partied until the early hours yesterday, Maria de la Cruz, the wife of Ecuador's highest-paid footballer, was tucked up in bed at 10pm.
David Beckham and his fellow English multi-millionaires have lavished tens of thousands of pounds bringing over a whole coterie of big-spending, high-living wives, partners and assorted hangers-on to Germany for the World Cup. But Ecuador, England's opponents tomorrow have only one star, Ulises de la Cruz, and his wife is no Posh.
Not for her the marathon shopping trips or raucous nights out; not for her the pampering or the bling.
She spends all her time with her 20-month-old daughter, Samantha, strolling around the grounds of her team's modest hotel.
"We live quietly," Mrs de la Cruz, 25, a farmer's daughter, said. "I wish there were some more wives from Ecuador here with me but they're not. They can't afford to travel such a long way from Ecuador."
Mrs de la Cruz, who wears braces on her teeth and no make-up, said: "I don't like designer clothes. They are too expensive. I just wear clothes that are from ordinary shops."I am not famous in Ecuador. It's just my husband who is well known and I think that is a good thing."
Home for Mrs de la Cruz, whose husband plays for Aston Villa, is a semi-detached house in Sutton Coldfield, on the outskirts of Birmingham.
She is staying with the Ecuador team at the Bristol Hotel in Bad Kissinden, a spa town 175 miles from the England base in Baden-Baden. Rooms cost about £56-a-night compared with the £1,080 Posh and her colleagues are paying at the Brenner's Park Hotel.
Yesterday 19 of the 22 wives and girlfriends of the England team, who are reported to have spent £10,000 on fake tans, were recovering after partying until 4am.
The evening began when Nancy Dell'Olio, girlfriend of the manager Sven-Goran Eriksson, invited the women out for a farewell dinner at a restaurant in a moated castle near Baden-Baden. This will be the last tournament with England for Miss Dell'Olio because her boyfriend is being replaced as manager.
The women racked up a bill of £3,000 for lobster, steak and champagne before returning to the town to finish the night off. The bill was charged to their hotel for the players to pay.
At a bar called Garibaldi's they sang along with England fans and downed bottles of champagne with strawberry syrup, glasses of vodka and Red Bull and shots of sambucca.
Among those celebrating were Elen Rives, Frank Lampard's fiancee, Michael Carrick's girlfriend Lisa Roughead, Stewart Downing's girlfriend Michaela Henderson-Thynne and Alex Curran, Steven Gerrard's girlfriend. They tottered back to their hotel when the bar closed.
The other question it raises, is who is the one member of the 23 man England squad without wife or girlfriend, and why is he without? No doubt some will suggest it is Sol Campbell who has suffered speculation that he is gay. But who knows, and quite frankly I don't really care: but perhaps you do! ??
It is not so much a game of two halves as one of two other halves.
As Coleen McLoughlin, Wayne Rooney's girlfriend, partied until the early hours yesterday, Maria de la Cruz, the wife of Ecuador's highest-paid footballer, was tucked up in bed at 10pm.
David Beckham and his fellow English multi-millionaires have lavished tens of thousands of pounds bringing over a whole coterie of big-spending, high-living wives, partners and assorted hangers-on to Germany for the World Cup. But Ecuador, England's opponents tomorrow have only one star, Ulises de la Cruz, and his wife is no Posh.
Not for her the marathon shopping trips or raucous nights out; not for her the pampering or the bling.
She spends all her time with her 20-month-old daughter, Samantha, strolling around the grounds of her team's modest hotel.
"We live quietly," Mrs de la Cruz, 25, a farmer's daughter, said. "I wish there were some more wives from Ecuador here with me but they're not. They can't afford to travel such a long way from Ecuador."
Mrs de la Cruz, who wears braces on her teeth and no make-up, said: "I don't like designer clothes. They are too expensive. I just wear clothes that are from ordinary shops."I am not famous in Ecuador. It's just my husband who is well known and I think that is a good thing."
Home for Mrs de la Cruz, whose husband plays for Aston Villa, is a semi-detached house in Sutton Coldfield, on the outskirts of Birmingham.
She is staying with the Ecuador team at the Bristol Hotel in Bad Kissinden, a spa town 175 miles from the England base in Baden-Baden. Rooms cost about £56-a-night compared with the £1,080 Posh and her colleagues are paying at the Brenner's Park Hotel.
Yesterday 19 of the 22 wives and girlfriends of the England team, who are reported to have spent £10,000 on fake tans, were recovering after partying until 4am.
The evening began when Nancy Dell'Olio, girlfriend of the manager Sven-Goran Eriksson, invited the women out for a farewell dinner at a restaurant in a moated castle near Baden-Baden. This will be the last tournament with England for Miss Dell'Olio because her boyfriend is being replaced as manager.
The women racked up a bill of £3,000 for lobster, steak and champagne before returning to the town to finish the night off. The bill was charged to their hotel for the players to pay.
At a bar called Garibaldi's they sang along with England fans and downed bottles of champagne with strawberry syrup, glasses of vodka and Red Bull and shots of sambucca.
Among those celebrating were Elen Rives, Frank Lampard's fiancee, Michael Carrick's girlfriend Lisa Roughead, Stewart Downing's girlfriend Michaela Henderson-Thynne and Alex Curran, Steven Gerrard's girlfriend. They tottered back to their hotel when the bar closed.
The other question it raises, is who is the one member of the 23 man England squad without wife or girlfriend, and why is he without? No doubt some will suggest it is Sol Campbell who has suffered speculation that he is gay. But who knows, and quite frankly I don't really care: but perhaps you do! ??
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
